Valproate (All indications)

Severe cognitive developmental delay (Mental retardation) (3-6 years old)

R analysis
id Study   Lib. in paper Exposition period    Study type  Control type 
 
Tags OR 95%CI x1/n1 x0/n0 no cases no exposed ROB Ref.
S9391
R32880
Coste (Valproate) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2020 Diagnosis Mental retardation (F70–F79) (mean age of 3.7 years old) during pregnancy (anytime or not specified) retrospective cohort (claims database) exposed to other treatment, sick excluded Adjustment: Yes 4.00 [1.90;8.60]
excluded (control group)
15/991   10/2,108 25 991
ref
S9392
R32898
Coste (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020 Diagnosis Mental retardation (F70–F79) (mean age of 3.6 years old) during pregnancy (anytime or not specified) retrospective cohort (claims database) unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: Yes 5.10 [3.10;8.50] 15/991   3,398/1,710,441 3,413 991
ref
S9414
R33004
Meador (Valproate), 2013 IQ <70 (DAS) (at 4.5 years old) during pregnancy (anytime or not specified) prospective cohort exposed to other treatment, sick Adjustment: Yes 18.91 [0.99;361.27] C 4/39   0/73 4 39
ref
S9394
R32924
Cummings (Valproate) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2011 Significant delay (score ≥2 SD below the mean) (Bayley Scales of Infant Development or the Griffiths Scale) (mean age in years: m1=2.9 and m0=2.7) throughout pregnancy retrospective cohort (registry) exposed to other treatment, sick excluded Adjustment: No 7.23 [0.39;134.94] C
excluded (control group)
5/58   0/35 5 58
ref
S9395
R32927
Cummings (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2011 Significant delay (score ≥2 SD below the mean) (Bayley Scales of Infant Development or the Griffiths Scale) (mean age in years: m1=2.9 and m0=4.3) throughout pregnancy retrospective cohort (registry) unexposed, disease free Adjustment: No 4.06 [0.46;36.05] C 5/58   1/44 6 58
ref
S9402
R32949
Gaily (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004 Mental retardation (Verbal and nonverbal IQ <70) 2nd and/or 3rd trimester prospective cohort unexposed, sick Adjustment: No 1.79 [0.15;21.49] C 1/13   2/45 3 13
ref
Total 4 studies 5.02 [3.12;8.08] 3,426 1,101
x1: number of endpoints among exposed, n1: number of exposed; x0: number of endpoints among non exposed, n0: number of non exposed; C: calculated odds ratio from numbers of events and effectives

Forest plot

StudyTE95% CIn casesn exposedweightROBABCDEF Coste (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020Coste, 2020 1 5.10[3.10; 8.50]3,41399189%ROB confusion: NAROB selection: NAROB classification: NAROB missing: NAROB mesure: NAROB reporting: NA Meador (Valproate), 2013Meador, 2013 2 18.91[0.99; 361.27]4393%ROB confusion: moderateROB selection: lowROB classification: lowROB missing: moderateROB mesure: lowROB reporting: low Cummings (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2011Cummings, 2011 3 4.06[0.46; 36.05]6585%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: lowROB classification: moderateROB missing: unclearROB mesure: lowROB reporting: moderate Gaily (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004Gaily, 2004 4 1.79[0.15; 21.49]3134%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: lowROB classification: moderateROB missing: criticalROB mesure: lowROB reporting: moderate Total (4 studies) I2 = 0% 5.02[3.12; 8.08]3,4261,1010.550.01.0ROB: A: confusion, B: selection, C: classification, D: missing, E: measurement, F: reportinglow,moderate,serious,critical,unclear,

1: Valproate) (Controls unexposed, NOS; 2: Valproate; 3: Valproate) (Controls unexposed, disease free; 4: Valproate) (Controls unexposed, sick;

Sensitivity analysis

SubsetTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2 Type of studies cohort studiescohort studies 5.02[3.12; 8.08]3,4261,1010%NACoste (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020 Meador (Valproate), 2013 Cummings (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2011 Gaily (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004 4 case control studiescase control studies 0 Type of controls unexposed (disease free or unspecified)unexposed (disease free or unspecified) 5.04[3.08; 8.24]3,4191,0490%NACoste (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020 Cummings (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2011 2 unexposed, sickunexposed, sick 1.79[0.15; 21.49]313 -NAGaily (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004 1 exposed to other treatment, sickexposed to other treatment, sick 18.91[0.99; 361.27]439 -NAMeador (Valproate), 2013 1 Tags Adjustment   - No  - No 2.84[0.55; 14.65]9710%NACummings (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2011 Gaily (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004 2   - Yes  - Yes 5.29[3.22; 8.70]3,4171,0300%NACoste (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020 Meador (Valproate), 2013 2 All studiesAll studies 5.02[3.12; 8.08]3,4261,1010%NACoste (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020 Meador (Valproate), 2013 Cummings (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2011 Gaily (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004 40.550.01.0

Publication bias and p-hacking diagnosis

funnel plot
0.0-3.55.21.8060.000Coste (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020Meador (Valproate), 2013Cummings (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2011Gaily (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004

Asymetry test p-value = NaN (by Egger's regression)

not enought points

p values plot
0.01.00.01.0

Sub-groups analysis using all included studies

excluded 9394, 9391

Sub-groupsTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2ROB type of controls unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified)unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified) 5.04[3.08; 8.24]3,4191,0490%NACoste (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020 Cummings (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2011 2 unexposed, sick controlsunexposed, sick controls 1.79[0.15; 21.49]313 -NAGaily (Valproate) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004 1 exposed to other treatment, sick controlsexposed to other treatment, sick controls 4.53[2.23; 9.21]341,0880%NACoste (Valproate) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2020 Meador (Valproate), 2013 Cummings (Valproate) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2011 30.510.01.0