Phenobarbital (Epilepsy)

Preterm (< 37 weeks)

R analysis
id Study   Lib. in paper Exposition period    Study type  Control type 
 
Tags OR 95%CI x1/n1 x0/n0 no cases no exposed ROB Ref.
S7981
R24252
Coste (Phenobarbital) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2020 Gestational age at birth (< 37 WA) during pregnancy (anytime or not specified) retrospective cohort (claims database) exposed to other treatment, sick excluded Adjustment: No Controls: mixed indications 0.95 [0.38;2.39] C
excluded (control group)
5/84   175/2,813 180 84
ref
S7809
R23143
Coste (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020 Gestational age at birth (< 37 WA) during pregnancy (anytime or not specified) retrospective cohort (claims database) unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: No 1.12 [0.45;2.77] C 5/84   91,255/1,710,441 91,260 84
ref
S5590
R19018
Endo (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2004 Preterm delivery (< week 37) throughout pregnancy retrospective cohort unexposed, disease free excluded Adjustment: No 0.59 [0.07;4.70] C
excluded (control group)
1/10   104/656 105 10
ref
S8225
R25801
Endo (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004 Preterm delivery (< week 37) throughout pregnancy retrospective cohort unexposed, sick Adjustment: No 0.18 [0.00;12.84] C 1/10   0/1 1 10
ref
S7397
R21726
Koch (Phenobarbital), 1996 Prematurity (< 37 weeks) during pregnancy (anytime or not specified) prospective cohort unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: No Matched 6.05 [0.21;177.04] C 0/4   1/65 1 4
ref
S5526
R19262
Van der Pol (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 1991 Gestational age (≤ 37 wk) throughout pregnancy prospective cohort unexposed, disease free excluded Adjustment: No Matched 1.16 [0.12;11.40] C
excluded (control group)
1/12   4/55 5 12
ref
S6824
R19312
Van der Pol (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 Gestational age (≤ 37 wk) throughout pregnancy prospective cohort unexposed, sick Adjustment: No 0.91 [0.07;11.19] C 1/12   2/22 3 12
ref
Total 4 studies 1.13 [0.50;2.55] 91,265 110
x1: number of endpoints among exposed, n1: number of exposed; x0: number of endpoints among non exposed, n0: number of non exposed; C: calculated odds ratio from numbers of events and effectives

Forest plot

StudyTE95% CIn casesn exposedweightROBABCDEF Coste (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020Coste, 2020 1 1.12[0.45; 2.77]91,2608480%ROB confusion: NAROB selection: NAROB classification: NAROB missing: NAROB mesure: NAROB reporting: NA Endo (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004Endo, 2004 2 0.18[0.00; 12.84]1104%ROB confusion: NAROB selection: NAROB classification: NAROB missing: NAROB mesure: NAROB reporting: NA Koch (Phenobarbital), 1996Koch, 1996 3 6.05[0.21; 177.04]146%ROB confusion: NAROB selection: NAROB classification: NAROB missing: NAROB mesure: NAROB reporting: NA Van der Pol (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991Van der Pol, 1991 4 0.91[0.07; 11.19]31210%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: lowROB classification: moderateROB missing: lowROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Total (4 studies) I2 = 0% 1.13[0.50; 2.55]91,2651100.020.01.0ROB: A: confusion, B: selection, C: classification, D: missing, E: measurement, F: reportinglow,moderate,serious,critical,unclear,

1: Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, NOS; 2: Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick; 3: Phenobarbital; 4: Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick;

Sensitivity analysis

SubsetTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2 Type of studies cohort studiescohort studies 1.13[0.50; 2.55]91,2651100%NACoste (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020 Endo (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004 Koch (Phenobarbital), 1996 Van der Pol (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 4 case control studiescase control studies 0 Type of controls unexposed (disease free or unspecified)unexposed (disease free or unspecified) 1.26[0.52; 3.01]91,261880%NACoste (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020 Koch (Phenobarbital), 1996 2 unexposed, sickunexposed, sick 0.60[0.07; 5.22]4220%NAEndo (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004 Van der Pol (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 2 Tags Adjustment   - No  - No 1.13[0.50; 2.55]91,2651100%NACoste (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020 Endo (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004 Koch (Phenobarbital), 1996 Van der Pol (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 4 MatchedMatched 6.05[0.21; 177.04]14 -NAKoch (Phenobarbital), 1996 1 All studiesAll studies 1.13[0.50; 2.55]91,2651100%NACoste (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020 Endo (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004 Koch (Phenobarbital), 1996 Van der Pol (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 40.020.01.0

Publication bias and p-hacking diagnosis

funnel plot
0.0-5.15.32.6250.000Coste (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020Endo (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004Koch (Phenobarbital), 1996Van der Pol (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991

Asymetry test p-value = NaN (by Egger's regression)

not enought points

p values plot
0.01.00.01.0

Sub-groups analysis using all included studies

excluded 5526, 5590, 7981

Sub-groupsTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2ROB type of controls unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified)unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified) 1.13[0.53; 2.41]91,3711100%NACoste (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2020 Endo (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2004 Koch (Phenobarbital), 1996 Van der Pol (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 1991 4 unexposed, sick controlsunexposed, sick controls 0.60[0.07; 5.22]4220%NAEndo (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2004 Van der Pol (Phenobarbital) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 2 exposed to other treatment, sick controlsexposed to other treatment, sick controls 0.95[0.38; 2.39]18084 -NACoste (Phenobarbital) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2020 10.510.01.0