Lamotrigine (Epilepsy)

ADHD (Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder): Diagnosis/Risk

R analysis
id Study   Lib. in paper Exposition period    Study type 
 Control type 
 
Tags OR 95%CI x1/n1 x0/n0 no cases no exposed ROB Ref.
S15870
R65393		 Dreier, 2023 Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) - Corresponding ICD-10 F-chapter - Up to 22 years of age during pregnancy (anytime or not specified) population based cohort propective unexposed, sick Adjustment: Yes 0.83 [0.66;1.04] 95/5,288   528/22,203 623 5,288
ref
S8022
R39731		 Wiggs, 2020 Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (after 2 years of age) at least 1st trimester population based cohort retrospective unexposed, sick Adjustment: Yes 1.00 [0.59;1.69] -/-   -/11,298 - -
ref
S6604
R39734		 Bromley (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2013 Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (at 6 years old) during pregnancy (anytime or not specified) prospective cohort unexposed, disease free excluded Adjustment: No 7.24 [0.14;371.71] C
excluded (control group) 		0/30   0/214 0 30
ref
S6603
R39736		 Bromley (Controls unexposed, sick), 2013 Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (at 6 years old) during pregnancy (anytime or not specified) prospective cohort unexposed, sick Adjustment: No 0.86 [0.02;45.15] C 0/30   0/26 0 30
ref
S6295
R39719		 Rihtman, 2013 Conners’ Parent - ADHD Index (mean age 4-5 years old) at least 1st trimester prospective cohort unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: No extrapolated (cont. endpoint) 1.21 [0.57;2.56] -/39   -/52 - 39
ref
S6394
R39720		 Veiby (Controls unexposed, disease free) b, 2013 ADHD symptoms ≥ 2SD (at 36 months) (Specific checklist) (Parent-reported) during pregnancy (anytime or not specified) prospective cohort unexposed, disease free excluded Adjustment: No 1.50 [0.40;4.80]
excluded (control group) 		3/44   1,743/43,571 1,746 44
ref
S6393
R39721		 Veiby (Controls unexposed, sick) b, 2013 ADHD symptoms ≥ 2SD (at 36 months) (Specific checklist) (Parent-reported) during pregnancy (anytime or not specified) prospective cohort unexposed, sick Adjustment: No 2.74 [0.59;12.75] C 3/44   4/154 7 44
ref
Total 5 studies 0.89 [0.73;1.09] 630 5,401
x1: number of endpoints among exposed, n1: number of exposed; x0: number of endpoints among non exposed, n0: number of non exposed; C: calculated odds ratio from numbers of events and effectives

Forest plot

StudyTE95% CIn casesn exposedweightROBABCDEF Dreier, 2023Dreier, 2023 0.83[0.66; 1.04]6235,28877%ROB confusion: seriousROB selection: lowROB classification: criticalROB missing: lowROB mesure: criticalROB reporting: moderate Wiggs, 2020Wiggs, 2020 1.00[0.59; 1.69]--14%ROB confusion: seriousROB selection: lowROB classification: lowROB missing: moderateROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Bromley (Controls unexposed, sick), 2013Bromley, 2013 1 0.86[0.02; 45.15]0300%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: lowROB classification: lowROB missing: moderateROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Rihtman, 2013Rihtman, 2013 1.21[0.57; 2.56]-397%ROB confusion: seriousROB selection: moderateROB classification: moderateROB missing: lowROB mesure: criticalROB reporting: moderate Veiby (Controls unexposed, sick) b, 2013Veiby, 2013 2 2.74[0.59; 12.75]7442%ROB confusion: seriousROB selection: lowROB classification: lowROB missing: moderateROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Total (5 studies) I2 = 0% 0.89[0.73; 1.09]6305,4010.210.01.0ROB: A: confusion, B: selection, C: classification, D: missing, E: measurement, F: reportinglow,moderate,serious,critical,unclear,

1: Controls unexposed, sick; 2: Controls unexposed, sick) ;

Sensitivity analysis

SubsetTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2 Type of studies cohort studiescohort studies 0.89[0.73; 1.09]6305,4010%NADreier, 2023 Wiggs, 2020 Bromley (Controls unexposed, sick), 2013 Rihtman, 2013 Veiby (Controls unexposed, sick) b, 2013 5 case control studiescase control studies 0 Type of controls unexposed (disease free or unspecified)unexposed (disease free or unspecified) 1.21[0.57; 2.56]-39 -NARihtman, 2013 1 unexposed, sickunexposed, sick 0.87[0.71; 1.07]6305,3620%NADreier, 2023 Wiggs, 2020 Bromley (Controls unexposed, sick), 2013 Veiby (Controls unexposed, sick) b, 2013 4 Tags Adjustment   - No  - No 1.40[0.72; 2.72]71130%NABromley (Controls unexposed, sick), 2013 Rihtman, 2013 Veiby (Controls unexposed, sick) b, 2013 3   - Yes  - Yes 0.85[0.69; 1.05]6235,2880%NADreier, 2023 Wiggs, 2020 2 extrapolated (cont. endpoint)extrapolated (cont. endpoint) 1.21[0.57; 2.56]-39 -NARihtman, 2013 1 All studiesAll studies 0.89[0.73; 1.09]6305,4010%NADreier, 2023 Wiggs, 2020 Bromley (Controls unexposed, sick), 2013 Rihtman, 2013 Veiby (Controls unexposed, sick) b, 2013 50.210.01.0

Publication bias and p-hacking diagnosis

funnel plot
0.0-4.74.62.4220.000Dreier, 2023Wiggs, 2020Bromley (Controls unexposed, sick), 2013Rihtman, 2013Veiby (Controls unexposed, sick) b, 2013

Asymetry test p-value = 0.1349 (by Egger's regression)

slope=-0.2761 (0.1056); intercept=0.9451 (0.4648); t=2.0332; p=0.1349

p values plot
0.01.00.01.0

Sub-groups analysis using all included studies

excluded 6604, 6394

Sub-groupsTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2ROB type of controls unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified)unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified) 1.34[0.71; 2.53]1,7461130%NABromley (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2013 Rihtman, 2013 Veiby (Controls unexposed, disease free) b, 2013 3 unexposed, sick controlsunexposed, sick controls 0.87[0.71; 1.07]6305,3620%NADreier, 2023 Wiggs, 2020 Bromley (Controls unexposed, sick), 2013 Veiby (Controls unexposed, sick) b, 2013 40.510.01.0