Carbamazepine (Epilepsy)

Spina bifida

R analysis
id Study   Lib. in paper Exposition period    Study type  Control type 
 
Tags OR 95%CI x1/n1 x0/n0 no cases no exposed ROB Ref.
S6318
R26054
Veiby (Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2014 Spina bifida throughout pregnancy population based cohort retrospective exposed to other treatment, sick excluded Adjustment: No 0.97 [0.02;48.83] C
excluded (control group)
0/613   0/593 0 613
ref
S6320
R26059
Veiby (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Spina bifida throughout pregnancy population based cohort retrospective unexposed, sick Adjustment: No 0.88 [0.05;17.04] C 0/613   3/3,773 3 613
ref
S8137
R24993
Charlton (Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2011 Spina bifida 1st trimester retrospective cohort (claims database) exposed to other treatment, sick excluded Adjustment: No 0.31 [0.01;15.93] C
excluded (control group)
0/311   0/98 0 311
ref
S331
R24990
Charlton (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2011 Spina bifida 1st trimester retrospective cohort (claims database) unexposed, sick Adjustment: No 0.58 [0.03;12.10] C 0/311   2/902 2 311
ref
S8411
R26708
Jentink (Carbamazepine), 2010 Spina bifida 1st trimester case control unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: Yes 2.60 [1.20;5.30] 8/-   -/- - -
ref
S5529
R16225
Viinikainen (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick) a, 2006 Spina bifida throughout pregnancy prospective cohort unexposed, sick Adjustment: No 0.72 [0.01;36.90] C 0/72   0/52 0 72
ref
S302
R15848
Artama (Carbamazepine), 2005 Spina bifida 1st trimester retrospective cohort (registry) unexposed, sick Adjustment: No 1.17 [0.02;58.86] C 0/805   0/939 0 805
ref
S8410
R26713
Källén (Carbamazepine), 1994 Spina bifida during pregnancy (anytime or not specified) excluded nested case control unexposed, sick Adjustment: No Matched 39.00 [0.53;2883.82] C
excluded (exposition period)
2/3   0/6 2 3
ref
S6823
R19294
Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 1991 Spina bifida occulta throughout pregnancy prospective cohort unexposed, disease free excluded Adjustment: No Matched 5.19 [0.10;276.47] C
excluded (control group)
0/11   0/55 0 11
ref
S6825
R19344
Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 Spina bifida occulta throughout pregnancy prospective cohort unexposed, sick Adjustment: No 0.65 [0.02;17.40] C 0/11   1/22 1 11
ref
Total 6 studies 2.04 [1.05;3.97] 6 1,812
x1: number of endpoints among exposed, n1: number of exposed; x0: number of endpoints among non exposed, n0: number of non exposed; C: calculated odds ratio from numbers of events and effectives

Forest plot

StudyTE95% CIn casesn exposedweightROBABCDEF Veiby (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014Veiby, 2014 1 0.88[0.05; 17.04]36135%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: moderateROB classification: moderateROB missing: moderateROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Charlton (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2011Charlton, 2011 2 0.58[0.03; 12.10]23115%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: moderateROB classification: criticalROB missing: unclearROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Jentink (Carbamazepine), 2010Jentink, 2010 3 2.60[1.20; 5.30]--80%ROB confusion: NAROB selection: NAROB classification: NAROB missing: NAROB mesure: NAROB reporting: NA Viinikainen (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick) a, 2006Viinikainen, 2006 4 0.72[0.01; 36.90]0723%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: moderateROB classification: moderateROB missing: unclearROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Artama (Carbamazepine), 2005Artama, 2005 5 1.17[0.02; 58.86]08053%ROB confusion: NAROB selection: NAROB classification: NAROB missing: NAROB mesure: NAROB reporting: NA Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991Van der Pol, 1991 6 0.65[0.02; 17.40]1114%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: moderateROB classification: moderateROB missing: lowROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Total (6 studies) I2 = 0% 2.04[1.05; 3.97]61,8120.210.01.0ROB: A: confusion, B: selection, C: classification, D: missing, E: measurement, F: reportinglow,moderate,serious,critical,unclear,

1: Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick; 2: Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick; 3: Carbamazepine; 4: Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick) ; 5: Carbamazepine; 6: Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick;

Sensitivity analysis

SubsetTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2 Type of studies cohort studiescohort studies 0.76[0.17; 3.39]61,8120%NAVeiby (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Charlton (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2011 Viinikainen (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick) a, 2006 Artama (Carbamazepine), 2005 Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 5 case control studiescase control studies 2.60[1.24; 5.46]-- -NAJentink (Carbamazepine), 2010 1 Type of controls unexposed (disease free or unspecified)unexposed (disease free or unspecified) 2.60[1.24; 5.46]-- -NAJentink (Carbamazepine), 2010 1 unexposed, sickunexposed, sick 0.76[0.17; 3.39]61,8120%NAVeiby (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Charlton (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2011 Viinikainen (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick) a, 2006 Artama (Carbamazepine), 2005 Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 5 Tags Adjustment   - No  - No 0.76[0.17; 3.39]61,8120%NAVeiby (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Charlton (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2011 Viinikainen (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick) a, 2006 Artama (Carbamazepine), 2005 Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 5   - Yes  - Yes 2.60[1.24; 5.46]-- -NAJentink (Carbamazepine), 2010 1 All studiesAll studies 2.04[1.05; 3.97]61,8120%NAVeiby (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Charlton (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2011 Jentink (Carbamazepine), 2010 Viinikainen (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick) a, 2006 Artama (Carbamazepine), 2005 Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 60.210.01.0

Publication bias and p-hacking diagnosis

funnel plot
0.0-4.75.42.4100.000Veiby (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014Charlton (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2011Jentink (Carbamazepine), 2010Viinikainen (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick) a, 2006Artama (Carbamazepine), 2005Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991

Asymetry test p-value = 0.0038 (by Egger's regression)

slope=1.2841 (0.1236); intercept=-0.8952 (0.1486); t=6.0259; p=0.0038

p values plot
0.01.00.01.0

Sub-groups analysis using all included studies

excluded 6823, 8137, 6318

Sub-groupsTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2ROB type of controls unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified)unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified) 2.66[1.28; 5.52]-110%NAJentink (Carbamazepine), 2010 Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 1991 2 unexposed, sick controlsunexposed, sick controls 0.76[0.17; 3.39]61,8120%NAVeiby (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Charlton (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 2011 Viinikainen (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick) a, 2006 Artama (Carbamazepine), 2005 Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 5 exposed to other treatment, sick controlsexposed to other treatment, sick controls 0.55[0.03; 8.84]-9240%NAVeiby (Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2014 Charlton (Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2011 20.510.01.0