Centrally acting antiadrenergic (versus unexposed) updated on 03-11-2025

Very low Apgar score (< 5) (at 1 min)

R analysis
id Study   Lib. in paper Exposition period    Study type  Control type 
 
Tags OR 95%CI x1/n1 x0/n0 no cases no exposed ROB Ref.
S13954
R54645
Sibai - Methyldopa (Controls unexposed, sick), 1990 Apgar score<5 at 1minute 2nd and/or 3rd trimester randomized controlled trial unexposed, sick Adjustment: Randomisation Indications Antihypertensive: Only chronic hypertension indication 0.62 [0.19;1.97] C 5/88   8/90 13 88
ref
Total 1 studies 0.62 [0.19;1.97] 13 88
x1: number of endpoints among exposed, n1: number of exposed; x0: number of endpoints among non exposed, n0: number of non exposed; C: calculated odds ratio from numbers of events and effectives

Forest plot

StudyTE95% CIn casesn exposedweightROBABCDEF Sibai - Methyldopa (Controls unexposed, sick), 1990Sibai - Methyldopa, 1990 1 0.62[0.19; 1.97]13880%ROB confusion: lowROB selection: lowROB classification: moderateROB missing: unclearROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate0.22.01.0ROB: A: confusion, B: selection, C: classification, D: missing, E: measurement, F: reportinglow,moderate,serious,critical,unclear,

1: Controls unexposed, sick;

Sensitivity analysis

SubsetTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2 Type of studies cohort studiescohort studies 0 case control studiescase control studies 0 RCTRCT 0.62[0.19; 1.97]1388 -NASibai - Methyldopa (Controls unexposed, sick), 1990 1 Type of controls unexposed, sickunexposed, sick 0.62[0.19; 1.97]1388 -NASibai - Methyldopa (Controls unexposed, sick), 1990 1 Tags Adjustment   - Randomisation  - Randomisation 0.62[0.19; 1.97]1388 -NASibai - Methyldopa (Controls unexposed, sick), 1990 1 Indications Antihypertensive   - Only chronic hypertension indication  - Only chronic hypertension indication 0.62[0.19; 1.97]1388 -NASibai - Methyldopa (Controls unexposed, sick), 1990 1 All studiesAll studies 0.62[0.19; 1.97]1388 -NASibai - Methyldopa (Controls unexposed, sick), 1990 10.210.01.0

Publication bias and p-hacking diagnosis

funnel plot

Funnel plot not drawn. Less than 3 points.

Asymetry test p-value = NaN (by Egger's regression)

not enought points

p values plot

Funnel plot not drawn. Less than 3 points.

Sub-groups analysis using all included studies

excluded

Sub-groupsTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2ROB type of controls unexposed, sick controlsunexposed, sick controls 0.62[0.19; 1.97]1388 -NASibai - Methyldopa (Controls unexposed, sick), 1990 10.510.01.0

Umbrella review (other published meta-analyses)

Published MAControlPeriodTE95% CIn exposedkI2 Firoz (Methyldopa) (Apgar score <4 at 1 min ( ...Firoz (Methyldopa) (Apgar score <4 at 1 min (versus Atenolol)) 1.18[0.93; 1.50]NA-Eexposed to other treatment, sickAnyduring pregnancy (anytime or not specified)studies TTT1 Firoz (Methyldopa) (Apgar score <4 at 1 min ( ...Firoz (Methyldopa) (Apgar score <4 at 1 min (versus Ketanserin)) 0.96[0.82; 1.12]NA-Eexposed to other treatment, sickAnyduring pregnancy (anytime or not specified)studies TTT1 metaPregmetaPreg 0.62[0.19; 1.97]NaN%88----Sibai - Methyldopa (Controls unexposed, sick), 1990 10.510.01.0