Study study type PathologyT1T0Patientssample sizesROB Results

breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative

versus placebo plus SoC
camrelizumab plus SOC
SHR1210-III-322, 2024
  NCT04613674
RCTbreast cancer - triple negative, es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA)camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy every 2 weeks.placebo combined with chemotherapy every 2 weeks.females aged 18 to 75 years with stage II or III (T2N0-1M0/T3N0M0 or T2N2-3M0/T3N1-3M0 histologically confirmed invasive TNBC. patients were required to have no prior systemic treatment for breast cancer222 / 219low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 62 % increase in pCR (PE)
camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, significantly improved the rate of pathological complete response (56.8% vs 44.7%).
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
durvalumab alone
Saphir02 Breast-Immuno, 2021
  NCT02299999
RCTbreast cancer - triple negativedurvalumabchemotherapypatients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (Her2)-negative metastatic breast cancer whose disease did not progress after initial chemotherapy (maintenance chemotherapy).131 / 68some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 40 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
Maintenance chemotherapy was more effective than durvalumab in patients with hormone receptor-positive and Her2-negative disease.

mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA) breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative metastatic mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA)

versus carboplatin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide
atezolizumab based treatment, carboplatin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide
NSABP B-59/GBG 96-GeparDouze, 2018
  NCT03281954
RCTmBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA)atezolizumab plus NAC (neoadjuvant chemotherapy)placebo plus NACPatients with centrally-confirmed ER-neg, PR-neg, HER2-neg invasive breast cancer by ASCO/CAP guidelines, stage T2 or T3 if cN0 or cN1 with negative biopsy or T1c, T2, or T3 if cN1 with positive biopsy or cN2 or cN3. LVEF > 55% and no significant cardiac history773 / 777NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 20 % decrease in events or deaths (EFS),events or deaths (EFS),events or deaths (EFS) (PE)

mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1) breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative metastatic mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1)

versus nab-paclitaxel
camrelizumab alone, nab-paclitaxel
FUTURE-SUPER_immunomodulatory subtype, 2024
  NCT04395989
RCTmBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1)camrelizumab plus famitinib plus nab-paclitaxelnab-paclitaxelfemales aged 18–70 years with an histologically confirmed, untreated metastatic or recurrent triple-negative breast cancer69 / 70some concern
inconclusive
  • suggested 54 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS)
the subtyping-based precision treatment showed significantly improved progression-free survival compared with standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
capivasertib plus paclitaxel
PAKT (PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered), 2020
  NCT02423603
RCTmBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1)capiversatib plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients had histologically confirmed, metastatic or locally advanced TNBC not amenable to curative resection. Previous systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease was not permitted, but previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was allowed.17 / 11NA
suggested
  • suggested 70 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS)

la/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all population breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative metastatic mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1) la/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all population

versus nab-paclitaxel
atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel
IMpassion-130 (all population), 2018
  NCT02425891
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationatezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxelplacebo plus nab-paclitaxelpatients with untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with nab-paclitaxel451 / 451low
conclusif
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 20 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 20 % decrease in PFS (extension)
versus nab-paclitaxel plus placebo
nab-paclitaxel plus toripalimab
TORCHLIGHT, 2024
  NCT0377759
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationtoripalimab and nab-paclitaxelplacebo and nab-PPatients aged at least 18 years with histologically confirmed TNBC, previously untreated or no more than one previous systemic chemotherapy regimen for stage IV or locally advanced TNBC that is not amenable to surgery353 / 178low
inconclusive
  • suggested 31 % decrease in deaths (OS)
  • suggested 23 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus paclitaxel
atezolizumab plus paclitaxel
IMpassion-131 (all population), 2020
  NCT03125902
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationAtezolizumab plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients had metastatic or unresectable locally advanced measurable TNBC, had received no prior chemotherapy or targeted therapy for aTNBC and had completed any prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer 12 months before being randomised to the trial.431 / 220low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
Atezolizumab (Tecentriq) in combination with paclitaxel did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) as a first-line treatment for patients with PD-L1–positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) / qualitative results only NO ROB
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
capivasertib plus paclitaxel
PAKT (all population), 2020
  NCT02423603
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationcapiversatib plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients had histologically confirmed, metastatic or locally advanced TNBC not amenable to curative resection. Previous systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease was not permitted, but previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was allowed.70 / 70NA
suggested
  • suggested 39 % decrease in deaths (OS)
  • inconclusive 26 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
ipatasertib plus paclitaxel
LOTUS, 2017
  NCT02162719
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationipatasertib plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelWomen with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC not amenable to curative resection. Previous systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease was not permitted. Previous (neo)adjuvant treatment completed at least 6 months before the first dose was allowed62 / 62NA
suggested
  • suggested 40 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
pembrolizumab plus SoC
KEYNOTE-355 (all population), 2020
  NCT02819518
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationPembrolizumab plus chemotherapyplacebo plus chemotherapypatients with with untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (all population)566 / 281low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 11 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • suggested 18 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 76 % decrease in objective responses (ORR)
OS results from ESMO Congres 2021
veliparib plus paclitaxel plus carboplatin
BrighTNess (velaparib-P-C (arm A) vs paclitaxel - carboplatin (arm B)), 2018
  NCT02032277
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationveliparib plus paclitaxel plus carboplatinplacebo plus paclitaxel plus carboplatinPatients: women who had histologically or cytologically confirmed invasive TNBC, clinical stage II-III316 / 160NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 12 % increase in events or deaths (EFS) (PE)
  • inconclusive 25 % increase in events or deaths (EFS) (PE)
  • inconclusive 16 % decrease in pCR (PE)
BrighTNess (velaparib-P-C (arm A) vs paclitaxel alone (arm C)), 2018
  NCT02032277
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationveliparib plus paclitaxel plus carboplatinplacebo matching veliparib plus placebo matching carboplatin plus paclitaxelPatients: women who had histologically or cytologically confirmed invasive TNBC, clinical stage II-III316 / 158NA
conclusif
  • inconclusive 18 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 1.5-fold increase in pCR (PE)
  • suggested 37 % decrease in events or deaths (EFS) (PE)

la/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positive breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative metastatic mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1) la/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positive

versus nab-paclitaxel
atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel
IMpassion-130 (PDL1>1%), 2018
  NCT02425891
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positiveatezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxelplacebo plus nab-paclitaxelpatients with untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with nab-paclitaxel, and PDL1 positive population (>1%)185 / 184low
conclusif
  • suggested 29 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 38 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 37 % decrease in PFS (extension)
versus nab-paclitaxel plus placebo
nab-paclitaxel plus toripalimab
TORCHLIGHT PDL 1 positive population, 2024
  NCT03777579
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positivetoripalimab and nab-paclitaxelplacebo and nab-PPatients aged at least 18 years with histologically confirmed TNBC, previously untreated or no more than one previous systemic chemotherapy regimen for stage IV or locally advanced TNBC that is not amenable to surgery200 / 100low
conclusif
  • suggested 38 % decrease in deaths (OS)
  • demonstrated 35 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
The addition of toripalimab to nab-P provided a significant improvement in PFS for PD-L1-positive patients with metastatic or recurrent TNBC with an acceptable safety profile.
versus paclitaxel
atezolizumab plus paclitaxel
IMpassion-131 (PD-L1 > 1%), 2020
  NCT03125902
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positiveAtezolizumab plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients had metastatic or unresectable locally advanced measurable TNBC, had received no prior chemotherapy or targeted therapy for aTNBC and had completed any prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer 12 months before being randomised to the trial.191 / 101low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 18 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
pembrolizumab plus SoC
KEYNOTE-355 (CPS>1), 2020
  NCT02819518
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumab plus chemotherapyplacebo plus chemotherapypatients with with untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (PDL1 CPS>1)425 / 211low
suggested
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • suggested 25 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
OS results from ESMO Congres 2021
KEYNOTE-355 (CPS>10), 2020
  NCT02819518
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumab plus chemotherapyplacebo plus chemotherapypatients with with untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (PDL1 CPS>10)220 / 103low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 27 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 34 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
Pembrolizumab–chemotherapy showed a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival versus placebo–chemotherapy among patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer with CPS of 10 or more.

mBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2) breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative metastatic mBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2)

versus Standard of Care (SoC)
sacituzumab govitecan
ASCENT (all population), 2021
  NCT02574455
RCTmBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2)Sacituzumab govitecansingle agent chemotheraopy of the physician's choice (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine or gemcitabine)Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer that was relapsed or refractory to two or more previous standard chemotherapy regimens for unresectable, locally andvanced or metastatic disease (previous thearapy had to include taxanes).267 / 262NA
suggested
  • suggested 49 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • suggested 57 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
ASCENT (patients without brain metastases), 2021
  NCT02574455
RCTmBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2)Sacituzumab govitecansingle agent chemotheraopy² of the physician's choice (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine or gemcitabine)Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer that was relapsed or refractory to two or more previous standard chemotherapy regimens for unresectable, locally andvanced or metastatic disease (previous thearapy had to include taxanes).235 / 233NA
suggested
  • suggested 52 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • suggested 59 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
talazoparib
EMBRACA, 2018
  NCT01945775
RCTmBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2)talazoparibchemotherapyPatients with HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and a deleterious or suspected deleterious gBRCA1/2 mutation. Patients had received 3 or less previous cytotoxic regimens for advanced disease and previous treatment with a taxane, an anthracycline, or both (unless contraindicated).287 / 144NA
conclusif
  • inconclusive 15 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 46 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 4.0-fold increase in objective responses (ORR) (PE)

la/mBC - TNBC - L2 - all population breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative metastatic mBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2) la/mBC - TNBC - L2 - all population

versus carboplatin, gemcitabine
atezolizumab based treatment, carboplatin, gemcitabine
IMpassion-132 (ITT population), 2024
  NCT03371017
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - all populationatezolizumab plus SOCplacebo plus SOCPatients with locally advanced/metastatic TNBC recurring ≤12 months after completing standard (neo)adjuvant anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy or surgery in early stage297 / 298low
inconclusive
    no statistically significant result
OS was not improved by adding atezolizumab to chemotherapy for rapidly relapsing PD-L1-positive TNBC
versus carboplatin
atezolizumab based treatment, carboplatin
TBCRC, 2024
  NCT03206203
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - all populationcarboplatin atezolizumab, 1200 mgcarboplatinclinical stage IV or metastatic invasive TN breast cancer. 0 to 1 prior treatments for metastatic disease, and no prior carboplatin in the metastatic setting or prior immune-oncology treatment were eligible. Patients were not stratified by PD-L1 status.56 / 50high
inconclusive
  • suggested 54 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS)
  • inconclusive 34 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide
atezolizumab based treatment, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide
Alice, 2022
  NCT03164993
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - all populationatezolizumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and low-dose cyclophosphamideplacebo and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and low-dose cyclophosphamidepatients with mTNBC, 18 years of age or older, with no more than one prior line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Inclusion of patients both with and without PD-L1 expression in tumors was allowed in this trial42 / 28high
suggested
  • suggested 43 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
The addition of atezolizumab to PLD/cyclophosphamide was tolerable with an indication of clinical benefit
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
olaparib
OlympiAD, 2017
  NCT02000622
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - all populationolaparibstandard chemotherapyPatients with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer that was HR positive or triple negative. Patients had a confirmed deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA mutation and had receive no more than 2 previous chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease.205 / 97NA
conclusif
  • inconclusive 10 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 42 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-119 (all population), 2019
  NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - all populationPembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC)312 / 310some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 3 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 60 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS)
  • statistically significant 40 % decrease in DCR,DCR
KEYNOTE-119 (all population) DUPLICATE, 2019
  NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - all populationPembrolizumabChemotherapyEligible participants were aged 18 years or older; had centrally confirmed metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; had received one or two previous systemic treatments for metastatic breast cancer, with documented disease progression on the most recent therapy; had receivedprevious treatment with an anthracycline or a taxane312 / 310low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 3 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 60 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS)
  • statistically significant 57 % decrease in DCR,DCR

la/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positive breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative metastatic mBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2) la/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positive

versus carboplatin, gemcitabine
atezolizumab based treatment, carboplatin, gemcitabine
IMpassion-132 (PD-L1 positive population), 2024
  NCT03371017
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positiveatezolizumab plus SOCplacebo plus SOCPatients with locally advanced/metastatic TNBC recurring ≤12 months after completing standard (neo)adjuvant anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy or surgery in early stage177 / 177low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 7 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-119 (PD-L1 CPS of 1 or more) DUPLICATE, 2019
  NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumabChemotherapy203 / 202low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 35 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS)
KEYNOTE-119 (PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more), 2019
 
NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumabChemotherapy96 / 98low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 22 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
KEYNOTE-119 (PD-L1 positive CPS = 10 or more), 2019
 
NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC)96 / 98some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 22 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
KEYNOTE-119 PD-L1 positive (CPS = 1 or more), 2019
 
NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC)203 / 202some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 35 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS)
KEYNOTE-119 (PDL1 CPS>10), 2019
 
NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients with PDL1 CPS> 10 only96 / 98some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 22 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
KEYNOTE-119 (PDL1 CPS>1), 2019
 
NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients with PDL1 CPS> 1 only203 / 202some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 35 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS)

es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA) breast cancer - triple negative es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA)

versus non active control
avelumab alone
A-Brave, 2024
  NCT02926196
RCTes-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA)avelumabcontrolPatiennts at High-risk Triple Negative Breast Cancer after completion of standard treatment with curative intent including surgery and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy.-/-NA
suggested
  • suggested 34 % decrease in deaths (OS)
  • inconclusive 18 % decrease in RFS/DFS (PE)
One year adjuvant avelumab versus control does not significantly improve DFS in high-risk TNBC patients. Nevertheless, the secondary enpoind OS was significanlty improved with avelumab vs control.
A-Brave Stratum A, 2024
  NCT02926196
RCTes-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA)avelumabcontrolPatiennts at High-risk Triple Negative Breast Cancer after completion of standard treatment with curative intent including surgery and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy.-/-NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 19 % decrease in RFS/DFS (PE)
versus placebo plus SoC
camrelizumab plus SOC
SHR1210-III-322, 2024
  NCT04613674
RCTbreast cancer - triple negative, es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA)camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy every 2 weeks.placebo combined with chemotherapy every 2 weeks.females aged 18 to 75 years with stage II or III (T2N0-1M0/T3N0M0 or T2N2-3M0/T3N1-3M0 histologically confirmed invasive TNBC. patients were required to have no prior systemic treatment for breast cancer222 / 219low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 62 % increase in pCR (PE)
camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, significantly improved the rate of pathological complete response (56.8% vs 44.7%).
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, gemcitabine plus platin
BCTOP-T-A01 arm A/B, 2024
  NCT02641847
RCTes-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA)docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatinepiribucine and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxelFemale patients aged 18-70 years with early triple negative breast cancer after definitive surgery.166 / 170NA
trade-off
  • demonstrated 49 % decrease in RFS/DFS,RFS/DFS,RFS/DFS,RFS/DFS (PE)

es-BC - TNBC - NA - all population breast cancer - triple negative es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA) es-BC - TNBC - NA - all population

versus carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel
atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel
NeoTrip Michel Angelo, 2022
  NCT02620280
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationatezolizumab plus SOCSOCpatients with previously untreated histologically confirmed unilateral triple negative breast cancer, early high risk or locally advanced. Pts with metastatic disease (stage IV) were excluded.138 / 142some concern
inconclusive
    no statistically significant result
The addition of atezolizumab to nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin did not significantly increase the rate of pCR in women with TNBC. In multivariate analysis, the presence of PD-L1 expression was the most significant factor influencing the rate of pCR (OR 2.08).
versus nab-paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide
atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide
IMpassion-031 (all population), 2020
  NCT03197935
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationAtezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportplacebo plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportneoadjuvant setting in participants with early stage (stage II-III) triple negative breast cancer165 / 168low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 95 % increase in pCR ,pCR (PE)
versus nab-paclitaxel
durvalumab alone, nab-paclitaxel
GeparNuevo, 2019
  NCT02685059
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationdurvalumab followed by nab-paclitaxelplacebo followed by nab-paclitaxelPatients with previously untreated uni- or bilateral primary, non-metastatic invasive TNBC with a tumour of at least 2 cm (cT2-cT4a-d) treated as neoadjuvant88 / 86some concern
suggested
  • suggested 76 % decrease in deaths (OS) (extension),deaths (OS) (extension)
  • inconclusive 45 % increase in pCR ,pCR (PE)
versus carboplatin, paclitaxel
atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel
NCI 10013, 2022
  NCT02883062
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationatezolizumab carboplatine plus paclitaxelcarboplatine plus paclitaxelpatients with clinical stages II and III TNBC.PDL1 status unknown for 59% control and 22% traitement arm patients45 / 22high
suggested
  • suggested 4.4-fold increase in pCR (PE)
versus paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide
atezolizumab plus paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide
ALEXANDRA/IMpassion-030, 2024
  NCT03498716
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationatezolizumab plus chemotherapychemotherapyPatients with newly diagnosed Stage II-III (es) primary invasive Breast cancer (BC) that is of triple negative phenotype and who were to be treated with adjuvant systemic chemotherapy following definitive surgery,1101 / 1098NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 11 % increase in iDFS,iDFS (PE)
At the final analysis, the addition of atezo to adjuvant anthracycline- and taxane-based chemo did not improve iDFS in the ITT population of stage II-III TNBC or in any of the subgroups interrogated. Safety data remain consistent with the known profile of atezo in early TNBC.
versus placebo
olaparib
OlympiA (BIG 6-13, NSABP B-55) unpublished
  NCT02032823
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationolaparibplacebopatients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative early breast cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and high-risk clinicopathological factors921 / 915NA
conclusif
  • demonstrated 32 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 42 % decrease in iDFS (PE)
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
pembrolizumab plus SoC
KEYNOTE-522, 2020
  NCT03036488
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationpembrolizumab plus SOCplacebo plus SOCpreviously untreated, nonmetastatic disease, stage II or stage III, triple-negative breast cancer centrally confirmed784 / 390some concern
conclusif
  • demonstrated 34 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 37 % decrease in events or deaths (EFS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 75 % increase in pCR (PE)
  • suggested 37 % decrease in events or deaths (EFS) (extended) (PE)

es-BC - TNBC - NA - PDL1 positive breast cancer - triple negative es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA) es-BC - TNBC - NA - PDL1 positive

versus placebo plus SoC
atezolizumab plus nab-paclitxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide
IMpassion-031 (PDL1>1%), 2020
  NCT03197935
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - PDL1 positiveAtezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportplacebo plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportneoadjuvant setting in participants with early stage (stage II III) triple negative breast cancer with PDL1 >1%78 / 76low
suggested
  • suggested 1.2-fold increase in pCR (PE)